Apparently, the "theory of everything" cannot withstand a challenge, even one put by a non-scientist such as myself."I would just point out what is obvious: the claim that space-time is supervenient upon biology is self-negating, as an independent and pre-existing space-time is necessary for both abiogenesis and the evolution of creatures capable of consciousness. Therefore, space-time cannot be a construct of biological systems.To claim that the extancy of the universe is a product of human consciousness, is more arrogant still. So, in "-centric," you have the right suffix to describe your theory, though I could think of a better prefix.This is not a scientific theory, but rather a metaphysical belief system unsupported by any evidence whatever."
- - - - - - - - - - - -Update: I returned home to notice that the comment-count had decreased on Lanza's article, which happened to be occupying another tab, unrefreshed. Below is a screenshot of another comment deleted after having been posted for four hours. The commenter's words will survive here.