Sunday, January 31, 2010
Im not a lawyer, but if it is legally sound to repeal the filibuster without 67 votes, then it should be done, even if doing so is politically unpopular. This mind-blowing article in American Prospect suggests precisely this can be done, if the action is taken directly after the new Senate is sworn in. Consider the impact this would have - we could return to having a democracy which functions on majority rule, and not minority dictate; a democracy like the one so meticulously created by our founders. That would give me goosebumps. READ THE ARTICLE.
Friday, January 29, 2010
This interactive tour through the scales of our beautiful universe, from the planck scale to the "edge" of the universe, will strain your brain to disbelief. I have not much more to say about this except to spend a good 15 minutes taking it all in. 'Fotoshop,' is the handle of the individual artist who created this lesson in the sublime, and he/she has won my great appreciation. What a fantastically executed exploration through a reality more incredible than any possible fantasy... via Tocsin via Bad Astronomy, cheers!
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
"Free speech is not for sale."
This is a very important matter that I've been involved in for some time. Phil Plait of Bad Astronomy fame, puts it briefly:
Please sign the petition, to be taken to MP Jack Straw tomorrow. (Unless you are content to look over your shoulder for the rest of your life.) Here is the comment I added to the petition: "Stop libel tourism. The U.K.'s libel laws shelter and protect those who perpetrate scams upon the public. Truth is the ultimate defense. Freedom of speech should be the first principle of any democratic government.""If you’re a regular reader, you know that the libel laws in the UK are truly awful. Instead of the burden of proof being on the accuser, as it should be, in the UK the burden is on the accused. So if I decide to sue you for something you wrote about me, it’s up to you to prove there was no malicious intent on your part. And it can cost you literally millions of dollars to defend yourself.
That, to be blunt, sucks. And it’s bad for freedom of expression, because it means that criticism of a claim can be substantially suppressed; who would want to speak out against, say, quacks, if they can sue you and cost you time and money?... These laws affect everyone on the planet (if you write something on the Internet, it’s entirely possible to be sued in the UK for it; this is called libel tourism and is a serious issue), so it doesn’t matter if you’re a UK citizen or not."