Monday, August 2, 2010

ADL Doublethink

Peter Beinart rips into the Anti-Defamation League for their self-defeating opposition to the planned Muslim community center near ground zero:
For a long time now, the ADL seems to have assumed that it could exempt Israel from the principles in its charter and yet remain just as faithful to that charter inside the United States. But now the chickens are coming back home to America to roost. The ADL’s rationale for opposing the Ground Zero mosque is that “building an Islamic Center in the shadow of the World Trade Center will cause some victims more pain—unnecessarily—and that is not right.” Huh? What if white victims of African-American crime protested the building of a black church in their neighborhood? Or gentile victims of Bernie Madoff protested the building of a synagogue? Would the ADL for one second suggest that sensitivity toward people victimized by members of a certain religion or race justifies discriminating against other, completely innocent, members of that religion or race? Of course not. But when it comes to Muslims, the standards are different. They are different in Israel, and now, it is clear, they are different in the United States, too.
What most churns my stomach is that those who seek to ban this center seem oblivious to their becoming ever more like the forces of intolerance we would legitimately oppose overseas.  This is the United States, to highlight the obvious.  We do not ban religious centers, and let's please hope we never will.

The ADL's charter says one thing, while the ADL itself is entirely happy to do the other.  It is a true shame.

More Here.

No comments:

Post a Comment